Side Area

Sex in America, Part 2

At least liberals are finally telling the truth about Bill Clinton — and just 20 years after it mattered! Of course, considering it took the Democratic Party a century to discover that slavery was wrong, two decades is lightning speed for these moral paragons.

While edging up to admitting that Bill Clinton maybe shouldn’t have raped Juanita Broaddrick and flashed Paula Jones, liberals still can’t own up to their utterly hypocritical defense of a president credibly accused of repeated sexual assaults and associated felonies.

Recently, The New York Times’ Maureen Dowd tried to cover up the left’s shameful response to Clinton’s sleazy behavior with the “both sides” argument. According to Dowd, liberals “tried to kill off” Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas “over sex when the real reason they wanted to get rid of him was politics.” And then conservatives “tried to kill off a Democratic president over sex when the real reason they wanted to get rid of him was politics.”

Here are three important differences off the top of my head:

1) Anita Hill’s accusations against Thomas involved words — just words — whereas Clinton was accused by multiple women of being a sexual predator on a scale to rival Harvey Weinstein.

2) The evidence against Thomas consisted of a single accuser, with no corroborating witnesses. The evidence against Clinton included, among other things, multiple witnesses; contemporaneous corroborating witnesses; secretly recorded confessions of the assaults and liaisons from Clinton himself (the Gennifer Flowers tape), Monica Lewinsky (Linda Tripp tapes) and Juanita Broaddrick (two separate tapes by people who wanted her to tell the truth about the rape); a DNA-stained dress; and, eventually, when he had absolutely no other choice, Clinton’s own admission under oath.

3) As Dowd says, the left was using Hill’s made-up charges against Thomas to save Roe v. Wade. By contrast, it’s absurd to imagine that Republicans were enraged by the policies of President Clinton — a neoliberal, Third-Way, welfare-reform-signing, Ricky Ray Rector-executing Democrat. Clinton was the last of a vanishing breed, the moderate Democrat. That just wasn’t a good enough reason to overlook his repeated sexual assaults, felonies and bald-faced lies.

It was liberals, and only liberals, who did an about-face on everything they supposedly believed about sexual harassment for political gain. The exact same people who had pretended to need smelling salts when told Thomas had joked about “Long Dong Silver” in the offices of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (never happened) were suddenly A-OK with a governor summoning a lowly state employee to his hotel room, dropping his pants and saying, “Kiss it.”

The erstwhile lynch mob against Clarence Thomas was fine with a presidential candidate using his campaign staff (including ABC’s George Stephanopoulos) to squelch “bimbo eruptions.”

Liberals were totally copacetic with the president of the United States using the full power of his office to smear his victims as liars, bimbos, trailer park trash and — in the case of Monica Lewinsky — a “stalker.”

In the middle of the Lewinsky scandal, feminist icon Gloria Steinem penned a New York Times op-ed launching the all-new “One Free Grope” rule. Steinem explained that Clinton’s smooth “kiss it” line to Paula Jones merely showed that — I quote — “Clinton took ‘no’ for an answer.”

No correction to Steinem’s pronouncement was issued days later when news of Juanita Broaddrick’s rape charge against Clinton began to circulate.

(If you doubt that the media are run by the totalitarian left, note that Steinem’s op-ed has been wiped from the Times’ archives. So I guess liberals do know how to wipe hard drives!)

Clinton was impeached for perjury and other felonies he committed to defeat Jones’ sexual harassment claim against him. Not one Democrat in the Senate voted to remove him from office. Not one.

As a consequence, the rule on sexual assault at least since Teddy Kennedy drowned Mary Jo Kopechne was this: Liberals were free to grope, rape and drown women and to smear them and their defenders. But conservatives, lacrosse players, fraternity members, pompous Fox News hosts and other objects of liberal hate would be destroyed at the slightest hint of any sexual impropriety, whether true or comically false.

What didn’t matter: The nature of the charge, credibility of the accuser, use of force, contemporaneous witnesses, photographic evidence, DNA evidence …

What mattered: Who’s the accused?

It would be as if pollution laws were enforced only against companies with Republican CEOs. Oh! It’s Harvey Weinstein’s firm? My mistake — go ahead, dump toxic chemicals into this pristine river.

That’s why the most shocking revelation to emerge from The New York Times’ expose of Weinstein last month was that it was published at all. Least shocking was that, before Ronan Farrow took his detailed account of Weinstein’s assaults to The New Yorker, NBC killed the story.

Also unsurprising: Soon after refusing to publish Farrow’s report on Weinstein, NBC was frantically peddling a letter by “Saturday Night Live” staffers defending Franken from his own multiple groping incidents. (It’s looking like the best way to defend Roy Moore would be to allege that Democratic Sen. Al Franken once fondled 14-year-olds.)

Still, with the Times’ expose of Weinstein, for the first time in 20 years, liberals have finally begun to notice the prodigious abuse of women by liberal men — other than Al Franken, of course.

Perhaps the day is not far off when we will have ONE standard for both liberals and the people liberals hate.  A girl can dream!


Ann Coulter
Ann Coulter is an American conservative social and political commentator, writer, syndicated columnist, and lawyer. She frequently appears on television, radio, and as a speaker at public and private events.
Latest comments
  • And in case America didn’t catch NBC’s statement about the handling of Matt Lauer’s termination, it is well known that the media has been investigating numerous allegations of misconduct by Lauer for 2 months or more, and if no one knew about the “button” they (Mr. Lach) are both incompetent and/or colluding with Lauer to hid the truth, Time to look at the boss.
    Finally, it again proves, or should prove, that NBC and progressives are completely untrustworthy.

  • Ann has done it again by writing one paragraph that succinctly ties up the issue in a very stylish bow. The paragraph conveys a message that I have said to many people over the years but Ann is writing so she can pull in more things at once than I can in a conversation. Ann, you are to be congratulated for this gem: As a consequence, the rule on sexual assault at least since Teddy Kennedy drowned Mary Jo Kopechne was this: Liberals were free to grope, rape and drown women and to smear them and their defenders. But conservatives, lacrosse players, fraternity members, pompous Fox News hosts and other objects of liberal hate would be destroyed at the slightest hint of any sexual impropriety, whether true or comically false.

  • The button to me was a real head spinner. Thirty years ago my wife watched a soap opera that was on during lunch so I caught more than a few episodes. Some con artist raised money from the rich family on the show and he set up his office so that he could push a button and the phone would ring. He would pick up the phone and act like it was a big client with a big deal that was big, big, big. As Max Smart would say…”The old button under the desk trick…second time this month!!”.

    • Ah yes, the old Get Smart show. All these revelations of sexual misconduct one would think the media and the Democrats were all suddenly forced to use “the cone of silence”.

  • I don’t feel sorry for ANY of them!
    their actions got them into this mess and they should be in JAIL !!
    They can find sympathy in the dictionary inbetween $hit and syphilis !!

  • I agree with Ann on every point in this article. There is one thing that irks me, however, and it’s not just Ann that’ guilty of if. It’s the misuse of Democrat and Democratic. Pardon my ignorance, but when did the word democratic become an noun instead of an adjective? It’s the Democrat Party; not the Democratic Party. In my view the Democrat Party is anything but democratic. PAAALEASE use these words correctly in future columns.

  • Now we know why msm won’t report on dem politicians their covering each other.

  • Oh, but wait! 200+ paid off, compliments of “We The Taxpaying Public,” with 17 million dollars. Even allowing for several payments from ONE individual, those numbers should help fumigate a large portion of that Senate and at least dent that repugnant House!

  • Bam!!! I really wish every American could read this. It does really seem that the Democrats have always been on the wrong side of any ethical battle except maybe protecting the little guy/foreign worker in the early 20th Century.

    • Yes, it does seem that way. Why just look at the horrors of abortion. The latest revelation, in recent years, shows their favorite abortion clinic sells human parts left over from the deed, and more recently they found a judge to reverse a decision in Texas that was meant to curb the dismemberment of the fetus, a procedure that makes it easier to get all the parts out.

      Many, and I hope most of us would find this horrific, want it to stop, or call it murder, yet the Democrats insist on calling it, “A Woman’s Right To Choose”.

      How many more years will pass, and how many lives ended before one day, this party of the immoral, steps back and finally condemns the practice?

      • I think it really is a matter of an active conscience toward our Creator that affects our view of the unborn children. We need to keep praying for revival in America. The Lord knows our culture of peoples have suffered from destructive life styles and torn and broken hearts long enough. Sometimes I feel like people from other cultures who have come from all over the world under many dire circumstances have a clearer view about the Real Love and Freedom given to all through Faith in Christ Jesus our Lord and the appreciate the freedoms they now have to live out their Faith in peace. I think we all can repent that we haven’t lived out our Faith so as to really have a positive affect to rescue the parishing. We’ve been swallowed up in materialism and drugged by our entertainment world. We all need more of His Holy Spirit and Life in our lives. I pray God have mercy on our Nation of peoples. I’m thankful that “that” is possible. Great is His Faithfulness!

leave a comment